You make a good point Boot. I think it could get out of hand as anything can. So I say we be apart of it to help make sure it doesn't. But If there is no one person or persons in charge of anything, what can it hurt. Every team would be involved in a decision. And I'm sure there will be a few replays submitted that will end up as "thats racing" or no fault judgements. If we were all as open minded as you and I, there wouldn't be a need. When we bump somone and it ends up takin them out, we appologize, offer spot, whatever. Or if we make a mistake and get run over because of it, we dont make a big fuss we appologize and go on. But there are some that cause a big fuss and have everyone up in arms over silly stuff. I personaly like simple. But I would invite the idea to try out a committee that is there to aid in those situations that cant be settled within the event. I hear folks all the time comparing this all to "real" racing. It is a game and the experience can only be so real. In real racing, where I come from, if some one is spun whether on their own or with help, the yellow comes out everyone lines up, a judgement is called right then with the black flag if needed, and we go agian. With the absence of that ability and the amount of actual racers and race fans trying to get the realism in this simulated game, we find some folks dont care much for a bump or an occational accident. And we find some folks that flip out over the silliest thing. So basically I aggree with you in the thinking that we can do without this. But with reps from each team involved, I dont think it would be a dictator ship at all. You as a race director or a driver would ask for the assistance of the committee to settle the arguement. No team is forced to be part of the program. But all who are will be represented by people like you as a team owner. I dont see the harm in it as the committee would have no real power other than if somone blatently causes trouble within the committee or doesn't follow the committee rulings, then they wont be a part of it. That means what... nothing realy. Other than you wont be able to ask committee to help with a call, your team would not be represented with desicions on how the committee would operate, and the drivers that run your events won't have the committee appeal option (Maybe less will show up but I doubt it). People will still race reguardless. I just think this could work out for the benefit of all with the involvement of all. Think of it this way... If I have an issue I send it in and you, shock, goat, Karl, Ice, .... and any other team owner that is a member, simply watch a replay and give your feedback on it. Thats it. The committee doesn't say this is punishable by what ever... they simply make the call and it's realy up to the team to follow there own rules from that point. Can it fail? ... yep. Could it work? Only one way to find out. I guarentee if it gets to a point where teams are being forced to change rules and follow other teams example as to format, rules , and such where freedoms of individual teams to create there own rules and racing formats is impeeded... I'm out.
The copyright thing is only to show intelectual ownership of the name of the committee and the written materials to be protected from outsiders trying to use it as there own. Not that its a nessesity, but the copywrite is only so good. We all use fictisious nick names, so no fear of actual legal issues really. Just protecting the document itself.
In closing to my loooooong winded responce... I dont care if we go with the committee or not. I'm not trying to sell it, cause it aint mine. I'm racing now and will continue either way. I'm just splainin' what I think it will be about. This is all as you and Deadbolt put it "just my opinion".
If any of you have made it far enough to read this sentence... it's your turn to sound off.